2 Comments
User's avatar
Eelco Ubbels's avatar

The "Grind" regime diagnosis is consistent with current TAA positioning: equities remain ranked first at 61.5% overweight, but the trend signal is down, and bonds sit at rank four with 42.5% underweight and a rising trend. That combination reads exactly as the article describes: compressed opportunity, deteriorating trend quality, and bonds offering no reliable hedge.

UBP notes that "geopolitical events have triggered significant reversals in recent price trends, as asset prices are temporarily driven by technical factors, such as investors requiring liquidity and/or risk controls, leading to automatic position selling," a mechanism that amplifies regime transitions from Grind toward Abyss. UBP, Asset Allocation Award winner 2026.

The critical risk is that coincident liquidity signals provide no advance warning of the shift into the Abyss regime. What specific cross-asset signal in your framework would confirm that transition with the shortest lag?

The Technical Edge's avatar

Great point - and fully agree, liquidity itself won’t give early warning.

The shortest-lag cross-asset signal I watch is equity–bond correlation turning positive - that’s when the hedge breaks in real time.

Internally, the earlier tell is dispersion compressing while sector correlation rises - signalling the shift from selectivity to macro dominance.

So the sequence becomes:

Dispersion + correlation → equity–bond correlation → liquidity stress

Liquidity confirms - it doesn’t lead.